Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:52:23 06/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2004 at 09:22:10, Daniel Jackson wrote: >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?369410 >CM9K needs far too much time, and it is a mate in 15 rather than 17. My mistake. > >S8 mate in 18, 13 min >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?369444 > >Shredder gets it wrong. As long as it finds a mate, the solution is identical, from a game theoretical standpoint. It is a very frequent occurence for a chess playing engine to find a different and longer mate than a chess mate finder. The solution is not wrong. In fact, it is optimal. It just is not the shortest path to the goal. > >Mate in 15 with Chest 3.6 >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?369430 > >Chest 3.6 gets it right! > >There is more than one variation, but all lead to a mate in 15. > >For people who have very fast hardware, could you post your results with the top >commercial software? > >Thank You! > >Daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.