Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: summary + thanks to all!

Author: martin fierz

Date: 00:48:02 06/11/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 10, 2004 at 18:07:41, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On June 10, 2004 at 17:54:58, martin fierz wrote:
>
>>aloha!
>>
>>here's a summary for different processors, just taking the final search to depth
>>21 of the logfile:
>>
>>AMD64 FX-51   2.2GHz: 2042 kN/s (will singleton)
>>AMD64 type?   2.2GHz: 1926 kN/s (dann corbit)

hi dann,

this was less about what you posted than about the mess AMD makes with it's
64bit processors - there are so many different versions of that thing with all
different names (opteron, FX-51, AMD64) with different cache sizes etc. etc. ; i
simply don't understand that any more...

cheers
  martin


>Vendor ID: Advanced Micro Devices
>CPU Type ID: 0
>Family ID: 15
>Model ID: 4
>Stepping Code: 10
>Brand ID: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+
>
>------------------
>PROCESSOR FEATURES
>------------------
>FPU:     1              CMOV:    1
>VME:     1              PAT:     1
>DE:      1              PSE36:   1
>PSE:     1              PSNUM:   0
>TSC:     1              CLFLUSH: 1
>MSR:     1              DTS:     0
>PAE:     1              ACPI:    0
>MCE:     1              MMX:     1
>CX8:     1              FXSR:    1
>APIC:    1              SSE:     1
>SEP:     1              SSE2:    1
>MTRR:    1              SS:      0
>PGE:     1              TM:      0
>MCA:     1
>3dNow!:  0              3dNow!Ex:0
>SSE MMX: 0
>
>
>>AMD XP        3200+ : 1673 kN/s (thomas mcburney)
>>AMD XP/barton 2800+ : 1662 kN/s (vincent lejeune)
>>AMD XP        3000+ : 1657 kN/s (bryan hofmann)
>>P4            2.8GHz: 1466 kN/s (S J J)
>>AMD XP        2400+ : 1454 kN/s (martin fierz)
>>Centrino      1.4GHz: 1315 kN/s (martin fierz)
>>P4            2.4GHz: 1271 kN/s (martin fierz)
>>
>>i don't quite understand the XP 3000+/3200+ results, they are rather bad
>>compared to the 2400+/2800+. dummy that i am i also don't quite know the
>>differences between different AMD64 CPUs, but it certainly looks like this is
>>the way to go for my checkers program, although it is purely 32 bit!
>>
>>thanks a lot to all who contributed their results. now if i only knew why all my
>>machines are at the end of the list ;-)
>>
>>cheers
>>  martin



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.