Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:36:19 06/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2004 at 05:53:23, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On June 10, 2004 at 19:08:05, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On June 10, 2004 at 18:55:23, mike tubbs wrote: >> >>>Hi >>> >>>I'm a newbie, i was wondering what the strength of the current top five is on >>>ordinary hardware xp2000+? Are they Grandmaster Strength yet? >> >>Even in 1999 with a mere 450 Mhz, please take a look :-) >> >>http://www.geocities.com/marochess/ssdf/ssdf.htm > >YOU said the truth and now you forgot your own words? > >You said at http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?369716: >"...since I always believe that the SSDF rating List is way too inflated and >people here on this forum immediately compare the top 10 programs from the SSDF >with Humans grandmaster and if the human doesn't have and Elo higher than >> 2700 we don't consider them worthy. >PS: We need to take into consideration that the SSDF rating is simply a comp vs >comp rating and nothin more." > > And now you give SSDF's list of 1999, to support the statement that engines was >GM strength because their SSDF ELO was more than 2600?? > > > SSDF's engines ELO, doesn't have almost nothing to do with engines ELO against >humans. No one can believe that Shredder on an Athlon 1200MHz is 2800+ ELO. If >this was the case, then on a 2800+ XP would be 2900+. Too optimistic! I do not see how can you get this conclusion. How do you know that the difference between shredder8 A1200 and shredder8 2800+ XP is 100 elo against humans? Maybe it is only 40 elo. Assume that you are right that shredder on A1200 is weaker than 2800. How do you know that the ssdf list is also inflated for engines of 1999. Maybe it is only inflated for engines of 2004? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.