Author: Bryan Hofmann
Date: 08:21:05 06/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2004 at 17:54:58, martin fierz wrote: >aloha! > >here's a summary for different processors, just taking the final search to depth >21 of the logfile: > >AMD64 FX-51 2.2GHz: 2042 kN/s (will singleton) >AMD64 type? 2.2GHz: 1926 kN/s (dann corbit) >AMD XP 3200+ : 1673 kN/s (thomas mcburney) >AMD XP/barton 2800+ : 1662 kN/s (vincent lejeune) >AMD XP 3000+ : 1657 kN/s (bryan hofmann) >P4 2.8GHz: 1466 kN/s (S J J) >AMD XP 2400+ : 1454 kN/s (martin fierz) >Centrino 1.4GHz: 1315 kN/s (martin fierz) >P4 2.4GHz: 1271 kN/s (martin fierz) > >i don't quite understand the XP 3000+/3200+ results, they are rather bad >compared to the 2400+/2800+. dummy that i am i also don't quite know the >differences between different AMD64 CPUs, but it certainly looks like this is >the way to go for my checkers program, although it is purely 32 bit! The results I gave you were for a plain stock system XP 3000+ (Barton Core) with 333 FSB. Vincent's system is overclocked thus the result is higher. I can push my systems FSB up to 344 and I get 1713kN/s on the final search depth. With better memory this could be pushed further and still maintain stability of the system. > >thanks a lot to all who contributed their results. now if i only knew why all my >machines are at the end of the list ;-) > >cheers > martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.