Author: martin fierz
Date: 08:46:51 06/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2004 at 08:12:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On June 10, 2004 at 17:54:58, martin fierz wrote: > >>aloha! >> >>here's a summary for different processors, just taking the final search to depth >>21 of the logfile: >> >>AMD64 FX-51 2.2GHz: 2042 kN/s (will singleton) >>AMD64 type? 2.2GHz: 1926 kN/s (dann corbit) >>AMD XP 3200+ : 1673 kN/s (thomas mcburney) >>AMD XP/barton 2800+ : 1662 kN/s (vincent lejeune) >>AMD XP 3000+ : 1657 kN/s (bryan hofmann) >>P4 2.8GHz: 1466 kN/s (S J J) >>AMD XP 2400+ : 1454 kN/s (martin fierz) >>Centrino 1.4GHz: 1315 kN/s (martin fierz) >>P4 2.4GHz: 1271 kN/s (martin fierz) >> >>i don't quite understand the XP 3000+/3200+ results, they are rather bad >>compared to the 2400+/2800+. dummy that i am i also don't quite know the >>differences between different AMD64 CPUs, but it certainly looks like this is >>the way to go for my checkers program, although it is purely 32 bit! >> >>thanks a lot to all who contributed their results. now if i only knew why all my >>machines are at the end of the list ;-) >> >>cheers >> martin > > >Now you understand why Vincent and Bob and I have been raving about the Opteron >for the past 6 months. > >anthony indeed... i would have bought one if i didn't already own too many computers. besides, i'm bewildered by the multitude of different versions of AMDs 64-bit processors and don't know which one to buy... cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.