Author: Franz Hagra
Date: 17:56:37 06/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
>How do you know that "my weaker hardware AMD 1400 (does never change to Rad8 >because it) can't go deep as 12"? Did you test it yourself? Because you have published this data in your Excel-Sheet: Fritz 8c; 256 MB Hash;8,0,0,23;.eng 03.03.03 on AMD 1400 depth=7/26 solve-t=1 And on the other hand who do you explain this behavior also from your Excel Data) Fritz------solve_t----depth --8c---------1---------7/26 --6a--------23--------10/29 --X3D-------79--------11/32 --8--------537--------13/36 --7d-------993--------14/37 I think every one can see the correlation between reached depth and solve_t! Simple question: Why have engine worse solve_t when the reach more depth? (and why no one of the authors have seen this in the data - do you only produce data without looking at them? - is this really a test methode?) Hagra PS: The WM test is also no test in mathematical or statistic sensce at all!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.