Author: Manfred Meiler
Date: 03:22:50 06/12/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2004 at 20:56:37, Franz Hagra wrote: >>How do you know that "my weaker hardware AMD 1400 (does never change to Rad8 >>because it) can't go deep as 12"? Did you test it yourself? > >Because you have published this data in your Excel-Sheet: > >Fritz 8c; 256 MB Hash;8,0,0,23;.eng 03.03.03 on AMD 1400 >depth=7/26 solve-t=1 > >And on the other hand who do you explain this behavior >also from your Excel Data) > >Fritz------solve_t----depth >--8c---------1---------7/26 >--6a--------23--------10/29 >--X3D-------79--------11/32 >--8--------537--------13/36 >--7d-------993--------14/37 > >I think every one can see the correlation between reached depth and solve_t! > >Simple question: Why have engine worse solve_t when the reach more depth? >(and why no one of the authors have seen this in the data - do you only produce >data without looking at them? - is this really a test methode?) > >Hagra > >PS: The WM test is also no test in mathematical or statistic sensce at all! For my answer please look at http://f23.parsimony.net/forum50826/messages/100888.htm. Manfred
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.