Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:20:48 06/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2004 at 11:42:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 13, 2004 at 07:50:25, Rex wrote: > > >>Once again we see Petr show his anti computer playing style. WHATS UP with >>these computer OP's. They obviously dont understand you just cant load the >>"defaults" and expect to win against GM's. There are Anti-Human settings that >>needs to be set in the personality editor if they expect to win. > > > The way Petr Kiriakov played this game was fine. It was not > a classical anti computer playing style. The GM cannot be > blamed for the wrong opening choice (Kings Indian) of Shredder8 > I think. But the game proved once again what I have already > mentioned many times: if GM's/IM's and even much lower rated > players use a boring style, it will hardly be possible for programs > to win a single game but computers will lose from time to time > and the ratings of chess programs will drop be 200-300 Elo. I think that 2 draws are not enough games to prove your theory. If a human go to a long match of 100 games and win few games without losses or even with a single loss then your point is proved. I think that every player at GM level has practical chances for 2 draws also in a match against kasparov or kramnik. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.