Author: mike tubbs
Date: 17:21:39 06/13/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2004 at 17:05:16, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 13, 2004 at 15:20:48, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 13, 2004 at 11:42:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On June 13, 2004 at 07:50:25, Rex wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Once again we see Petr show his anti computer playing style. WHATS UP with >>>>these computer OP's. They obviously dont understand you just cant load the >>>>"defaults" and expect to win against GM's. There are Anti-Human settings that >>>>needs to be set in the personality editor if they expect to win. >>> >>> >>> The way Petr Kiriakov played this game was fine. It was not >>> a classical anti computer playing style. The GM cannot be >>> blamed for the wrong opening choice (Kings Indian) of Shredder8 >>> I think. But the game proved once again what I have already >>> mentioned many times: if GM's/IM's and even much lower rated >>> players use a boring style, it will hardly be possible for programs >>> to win a single game but computers will lose from time to time >>> and the ratings of chess programs will drop be 200-300 Elo. >> >> >>I think that 2 draws are not enough games to prove your theory. >> >>If a human go to a long match of 100 games and win few games without losses or >>even with a single loss then your point is proved. >> >>I think that every player at GM level has practical chances for 2 draws also in >>a match against kasparov or kramnik. >> >>Uri > > > Of course, two games do not mean much. But one thing is almost > clear to me: computers play a complete different chess than > humans. And as long humans play the usual style, it will be > very difficult to compete with the best programs. If humans > play a computer adapted style, the strongest programs will > have (in my opinion) much less success. On the other hand, > such a playing style may heavily hurt humans usual chess playing > style. What to do in this situation: GM's/IM's and other players > should only fight against computers for fun in order not to ruin > their chess abilities. > Kurt Naw they play the same chess as Humans, if just seems different cause the computer doesn't take risk and never blunders, the game often seems boring cause the computer offers little chances from mistakes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.