Author: Mark Young
Date: 13:15:13 12/21/98
Cut from a post of Bruce Moreland Second, he was caught red-handed trying to destroy the place. He had nominated a moderator candidate, predicted his candidate would win in a landslide, and when there was a problem with this nomination, he used four different accounts (at least) to try to create an apparent ground swell of public support for his candidate, so the nomination would go forward. This raised some suspicions, and upon investigation it was found that he had at least 91 accounts, which certainly sounds like a potential landslide in the making. Stolen From RGCC. A post from Chris Whittington. It was fairly obvious that Sean had a large number of posting accounts. From the perspective of an outlaw, I can't fault him for fighting censorship in that way, if he felt fit. I asked him, after he nominated me, not to use these accounts to influence the voting. He agreed not to. Chris Whittington It looks to me that both Sean and Chris tried to rig our moderator elections. Sean nominates Chris, and from Chris’s post, he knew that Sean had many posting accounts and voting accounts setup. No need to put to fine a point on this, the connections are clear. I would hope that both of these people are banned PERMENTLY.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.