Author: Günther Simon
Date: 09:36:21 06/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2004 at 11:58:27, Peter Berger wrote: >On June 14, 2004 at 11:52:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 14, 2004 at 11:43:35, Roger Brown wrote: >> >>You didn't even read what i wrote. >>I wrote that it is not easy to get above 2200. >> >>And that crafty has problems getting much above it and it is the strongest FREE >>program currently. >> >>You could have put down gnuchess there too, but as you can see it is below 2200 >>rated. >> >>Get my point? >> >>It was not an attack to Hyatt. Instead it is you who do not even read what i >>write who is the problem. Uri just like you didn't read very well what i wrote >>either. >> >>Getting above 2300 is not easy. > >Although it might not be easy to write a program that outperforms 2200 ELO SSDF >it is not reasonable to claim that Crafty would have problems to do that if it >had to use its own book and booklearner. *not reasonable* is far too friendly here, in fact it seems Vincent had completely lost touch with reality if he claims 'it is not easy to get above SSDF 2200' for Crafty without CB book. We all now hatred makes blind though... >Ruffian 1.01 is rated 2679 >Yace Paderborn is rated 2607 > >Both use their own books and are still not likely to be more than 300 or 400 >points stronger than Crafty ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.