Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Spassky-Petrosian, Match, 1969

Author: Derek Paquette

Date: 15:11:17 06/14/04

Go up one level in this thread

On June 14, 2004 at 15:38:12, Daniel Jackson wrote:

>With todays top hardware/software, can the winning move e5!! be found?
>
>[D]r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1
>
>Daniel


I think that these position tests are absolutely useless,
an IM can draw a program, so who cares if it can find 'specific' moves

if it doesn't have a 'game plan' and can only draw,

whats the difference?

• Re: Spassky-Petrosian, Match, 1969 Uri Blass 18:42:13 06/14/04
• Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Anthony Cozzie 17:42:45 06/14/04
  • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Vincent Diepeveen 15:38:22 06/15/04
    • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Daniel Jackson 16:32:05 06/15/04
      • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Vincent Diepeveen 03:15:17 06/16/04
  • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Anthony Cozzie 04:48:51 06/15/04
  • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Mike Byrne 18:49:38 06/14/04
    • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Anthony Cozzie 19:29:03 06/14/04
      • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Vincent Lejeune 01:54:43 06/15/04
  • Re: Nolot #5 - 1:16 for Zappa Daniel Jackson 18:37:51 06/14/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.