Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:42:13 06/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2004 at 18:11:17, Derek Paquette wrote: >On June 14, 2004 at 15:38:12, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>With todays top hardware/software, can the winning move e5!! be found? >> >>[D]r2qrb1k/1p1b2p1/p2ppn1p/8/3NP3/1BN5/PPP3QP/1K3RR1 w - - 0 1 >> >>Daniel > > >I think that these position tests are absolutely useless, >an IM can draw a program, so who cares if it can find 'specific' moves > >if it doesn't have a 'game plan' and can only draw, > >whats the difference? It does not need a game plan to win. programs did super gm performance in tournaments and an IM can even draw against kasparov in a good day. It is probably not so easy to draw against machines(otherwise I could expect to see draw in almost every game between IM's or GM's and machines but there were significant number of wins for the machines even in the Israeli league when teams had the right to choose the player to play against the machine). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.