Author: Joshua Shriver
Date: 02:58:57 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 05:42:26, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 05:38:44, Joshua Shriver wrote: > >>Cache seems normal, but that is a bit slow... so these things even when running >>at smaller frequencies are outperforming Xeon and Athlons while also running on >>less power? That's awesome. > >My post (and the entire thread) are about clock for clock performance! > >The 1.7G Centrino may be fast, it is no match for my 2.2G Athlon64 desktop. > >-- >GCP Sorry, I was confused... kinda tired 5:55am here *darn insomnia* Anyway, my question really was just spawned from a discussion a week or so go, where I thought I read someone comparing a 1.5 or 1.7ghz Celeron against a 2.5 or 3ghz Athlon and the Celeron box was winning overall in matches. When I saw your post it just reminded me of that. (excuse numbers, not sure if they're accurate off the top of my head) Have a good day. Sincerely, Joshua Shriver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.