Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:43:51 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 08:16:30, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 07:58:42, Franz Hagra wrote: > >>>What is YOUR opinion about this? Should programs which solve 19 or 54, get the >>>same rating? The test formula calculates for these program's performances >>> >>>19 sol. --> 2.553 >>>55 sol. --> 2.649 >>> >>>But Hagra attaches 2.600 to both. I wonder who else accepts this as serious :)) >>>Send in the clowns... >>> >>>Steve >> >>Hagra attaches the range of 2550-2649 for both - using 2600 an sf=2 simplyfing >>this as usual for measurement data in common. > >And what is the sense of that contribution? :) I see no reason to "simplify" >these values in a way that makes most performance based ranking differences >disappear. > >We're talking a chess test, no? So I want to see different results for different >performances, not simplified ratings which result in identical values for such a >big bandwidth like 19...55 solutions. This is ABSOLUTELY NONSENSICAL. So what do >you want to tell us by that? > >Steve Steve we have now reached a problem. You insinuate complete madness or at least ignorance on the opposing side, but you are still expecting reasonable answers? As a psychologist I see a typical problem caused by your somewhat humpty dumpty writing style. Not that this couldn't be answered correctly. But you must admit it's kind of masochistic if one wanted for more of that sort. So either behave a bit better or this wont go further. Is it perhaps exactly what yxou wanted? :))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.