Author: Franz Hagra
Date: 08:57:12 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
>I studied Econometrics, so my statistical understanding is alright. Can you >explain WHY our (well, ...) "tool" in this case is believed to be only accurate >up to two digits? Because the number of positions that we test is low, or >because the time that we have is limited, ... ? >> First look at the formula: rating WM-Test = base 2600 + (2 x LQ) - [5 x (GZ : 100)] base=2600 , given range is set by the authors: 2500-2800 -> indicates 2 significant figures LQ range 0-100 -> indicates 2 significant figures GZ_min= 100x1s/60 -> [5x (1.6:100)] term_min = 0,08 GZ_max= 100x1200s/60 -> [5x(2000:100)] term_max = 100 -> indicates max. 2 significant figures Hagra
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.