Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Differences: Freedom of Speech = CCC /// Censorship = CSS

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 11:19:30 06/15/04

Go up one level in this thread


The fact alone that you are allowed to write all your funny drivel based on
misunderstandings or intentional joking against such experts as Wch participants
as Schroder, Dieppeveen or Blass, is a proof for me that this American hosted
forum CCC is way better than CSS.

In CSS you are thrown out if you argue with best logical reasoning against some
problem childs in the membership or the team. They simply argue - and this is
quite true - that every private man can decide with whom he wants to talk in his
own rooms. Yes - this is quite right on the surface! But is also correct in a
more reasonable perspective? Of course NOT. Because shouldn't you search for the
best possible arguments? Is it really good if one brown-nosers are visiting you?

I must make a statement! This is out of honesty!!

Since Frederic Friedel, the libertarian great old figure of German computerchess
is still somehow responsible in CSS behind the curtains, he assures that
everyone can read in that forum and so get at least all the information about
the standard software products - also if one is not allowed to write. Without
password. This shows style too.

But without Friedel the whole project would be lost in censorship and
provinciality.

Although it is extremely difficult to write in a second language instead of your
mother tongue, but it's worth it because here you have the real state of the art
statements. While in CSS there you have PR product like pushing of odd nonsense
in combination with censorship records.

Rolf, formerly writing as 'Schachfan' in CSS for 2 years - without a single
complaint other than being Rolf in the end...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.