Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 12:39:20 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 13:58:21, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 13:35:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>of course any test considering the solving time is flawed. > >ROTFL :)) I've written "send in the clowns" but now it seems to me, the king of >them all enters the stage! Wonderful entertainment! >It doesn't matter >>whether you find something within 5 seconds or 60, as long as you find it within >>tournament level. >He thinks all games in the world are played at min. 3 minutes per position, and >all analysis in the world is done with min. 3 minutes per position... >(The statement would be wrong even if that was true.) > >>I do of course realize how beginners love patzer moves, so new testsets will >>keep on getting produced by using patzer moves... > >That test consists of moves WORLD CHAMPIONS have won their games with! So, this >Deepeveen guy thinks Champions win with patzer moves! :)) >Who can beat this? :) 3 points: a) kasparov is not considered the best player ever because he instantly finds his brilliancies. His play is best because within the time control he finds the best moves. The important moves he usually takes up to 20 minutes to play them. b) this test contains only patzer moves. Of course from any selection of games it is possible to select patzer moves. Do you deny this? c) who are you? You seem not to be capable of even spelling my name, let alone spell chess.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.