Author: Steve Glanzfeld
Date: 13:09:10 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 15:39:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > a) kasparov is not considered the best player ever because he instantly finds >his brilliancies. His play is best because within the time control he finds the >best moves. The important moves he usually takes up to 20 minutes to play them. So what? I don't see the sense of that remark. Kasparov isn't a computerchess program I can blitz against, or analyse with at much less time than 20 or 3 min./pos.. whenever I want. > > b) this test contains only patzer moves. Of course from any selection of games >it is possible to select patzer moves. Do you deny this? Patzer moves are BAD moves you know :) not those which are chosen for a (bm) test. Forget it :)) you have no clue... Btw. who are you? :))) Not far away from me is a shop where I can buy ~10 different chess programs. For several years, I take a look at these then and when, read who the programmers are, what their achievements were etc. Your name was never among them. Steve
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.