Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 13:26:56 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 15:27:46, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 15:06:38, Dan Honeycutt wrote: > >>The word "must". Change that to something like "probably" or "most likely" and >>you're right on. It's easy to tune an engine to perform well in a test suite. >>Then you discover it plays like crap. Test suites are an indication of engine >>strength, but the final verdict is games. >> >>Dan H. > > >What would you say to Gurevich who states that his ranking list (analytical >abilities) is however _similar_ to those for playing strength - for now probably >some 250 engines? Isn't it more than an indication but a well linear connection? >Just curious. I haven't seen his list, but I would venture to say it's not linear. Otherwise he could change his equation and make it exact - nobody has claimed that have they? Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.