Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 13:56:44 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 16:33:41, F. Huber wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 15:46:03, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On June 15, 2004 at 15:39:26, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On June 15, 2004 at 15:33:41, David Dahlem wrote: >>> >>>>One of the problems with the current method of testing engines with test suites >>>>(e.g. WM-Test) is the problem of proving that the proposed solution move is >>>>actually the best move, especially with positions of a positional nature. >>>>Perhaps a new method would avoid this problem, namely a suite of mate positions, >>>>with known, more easily proven solutions? Time to solution could be the criteria >>>>by which engines are evaluated. >>>> >>>>Just an idea. Any thoughts? Would this work? >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Dave >>> >>>Hi Dave, >>> >>>a really very good idea! >>> >>>(Why? - Because here also ChestUCI could participate ;-)) >>> >>>Regards, >>>Franz. >> >>Hi Franz >> >>Yes, but wouldn't this be unfair, since ChestUCI can't play chess. :-) >> >>Regards >>Dave > >I really hope for you, that Heiner doesn´t read this! ;-) Hey, I _did_ read this! But then, Chest (or ChestUCI) in fact cannot play chess ;-) OTOH, that Chest could participate without being able to play, shows a week point of the test method, IMHO. Cheers, Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.