Author: F. Huber
Date: 14:36:22 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2004 at 16:56:44, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On June 15, 2004 at 16:33:41, F. Huber wrote: > >>On June 15, 2004 at 15:46:03, David Dahlem wrote: >> ... >>>Hi Franz >>> >>>Yes, but wouldn't this be unfair, since ChestUCI can't play chess. :-) >>> >>>Regards >>>Dave >> >>I really hope for you, that Heiner doesn´t read this! ;-) > >Hey, I _did_ read this! I was absolutely sure, you would! :) >But then, Chest (or ChestUCI) in fact cannot play chess ;-) Ok, no problem - I´ll implement it ... Almost everything needed (at least a move generator) is already here. So there´s just missing a simple routine for randomly choosing a move - wouldn´t play a _good_ chess, but indeed would _play_! ;-) >OTOH, that Chest could participate without being able to play, >shows a week point of the test method, IMHO. If you replace "could" by "couldn´t", then I would agree! ;-) Best regards, Franz.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.