Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:39:19 06/15/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2004 at 12:36:21, Günther Simon wrote: Another guy who didn't read what i wrote. Please quote my formulation instead of reading crap of others. >On June 14, 2004 at 11:58:27, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On June 14, 2004 at 11:52:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On June 14, 2004 at 11:43:35, Roger Brown wrote: >>> >>>You didn't even read what i wrote. >>>I wrote that it is not easy to get above 2200. >>> >>>And that crafty has problems getting much above it and it is the strongest FREE >>>program currently. >>> >>>You could have put down gnuchess there too, but as you can see it is below 2200 >>>rated. >>> >>>Get my point? >>> >>>It was not an attack to Hyatt. Instead it is you who do not even read what i >>>write who is the problem. Uri just like you didn't read very well what i wrote >>>either. >>> >>>Getting above 2300 is not easy. >> >>Although it might not be easy to write a program that outperforms 2200 ELO SSDF >>it is not reasonable to claim that Crafty would have problems to do that if it >>had to use its own book and booklearner. > >*not reasonable* is far too friendly here, in fact it seems Vincent had >completely lost touch with reality if he claims 'it is not easy to get >above SSDF 2200' for Crafty without CB book. >We all now hatred makes blind though... > > >>Ruffian 1.01 is rated 2679 >>Yace Paderborn is rated 2607 >> >>Both use their own books and are still not likely to be more than 300 or 400 >>points stronger than Crafty ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.