Author: chandler yergin
Date: 08:41:33 06/16/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2004 at 05:25:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 16, 2004 at 03:06:01, Matthias Gemuh wrote: > >>On June 16, 2004 at 01:04:11, chandler yergin wrote: >> >>>Kasparov wrote a nice article on the great Tal - Smyslov game, which appears in >>>this months Chess Life. >>>He used Fritz for some of the analysis. >>> >>>I refer to Pg 19 left column where he presents 13 ....Bd8 >>>He states: >>>"If Black had played 13..Bc5?, then Tal's fantastic idea would >>>have appeared in all its glory: >>>14Qh4 bxc4 15.Bc3!. >>>Believe it or not, Black is defensless against the numerous threats >>>(Rxd7, Nxg7, Qg5, Ng5), for example: >>>15...Qxa2 16.Rxd7 Bxd7 17.Nh6+ Kh8 18.Qxf6!! with Mate." >>> >>>I was skeptical of this, and checked it with Fritz. >>>Position after 15 Bc3 >> >>[D]r1b2rk1/p2n1ppp/q1p2n2/2b2N2/2p4Q/2B2N2/PPP2PPP/2KR3R b - - 0 15 >> >>> >>>Continuing with his Analysis; after 15....Qa2 16.Rd7 >>>r1b2rk1/p2R1ppp/2p2n2/2b2N2/2p4Q/2B2N2/qPP2PPP/2K4R b - - 0 16 >>>16... Bb4!! Saves the game. It took Fritz 0.01 seconds, so I don't see how he >>>could have missed it. >>>I wonder if he left out this analysis on purpose? > >It does not take my fritz 0.01 seconds > >I get analysis with Fritz by using the mouse and >clip analysis > >New game, >r1b2rk1/p2R1ppp/2p2n2/2b2N2/2p4Q/2B2N2/qPP2PPP/2K4R b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 8: > >2...h6! > -+ (-3.06) Depth: 5/26 00:00:00 138kN >2...h6! > -+ (-3.22) Depth: 5/26 00:00:00 144kN >2...h6 3.Bxf6 Bxd7 4.Qg3 Qa1+ 5.Kd2 > -+ (-3.25) Depth: 5/26 00:00:00 148kN >2...h6-- > -+ (-2.97) Depth: 6/24 00:00:00 164kN >2...h6 > +- (9.72) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 345kN >2...Bb4! > +- (9.69) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 347kN >2...Bb4! > +- (9.53) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 347kN >2...Bb4! > +- (9.22) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 348kN >2...Bb4! > +- (8.56) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 348kN >2...Bb4 > ³ (-0.38) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 419kN >2...Be3+! > ³ (-0.41) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 474kN >2...Be3+! > ³ (-0.56) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 479kN >2...Be3+! > µ (-0.88) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 487kN >2...Be3+! > -+ (-1.50) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 497kN >2...h5! > -+ (-1.53) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 649kN >2...h5! > -+ (-1.69) Depth: 6/31 00:00:01 675kN >2...h5! > -+ (-2.00) Depth: 6/31 00:00:02 723kN >2...h5 3.Nh6+ Kh7 4.Rdd1 Bxf2 5.Ng5+ Kxh6 6.Qxf2 Qa1+ 7.Kd2 Rd8+ 8.Ke2 Bg4+ > -+ (-2.22) Depth: 6/31 00:00:02 780kN >2...h5-- > -+ (-1.94) Depth: 7/28 00:00:02 933kN >2...h5 3.Nh6+ Kh7 > -+ (-1.94) Depth: 7/30 00:00:03 1103kN >2...h5 3.Nh6+ Kh7 4.Rdd1 gxh6 5.Bxf6 > -+ (-1.94) Depth: 8/29 00:00:05 1731kN >2...h5-- > -+ (-1.66) Depth: 9/33 00:00:08 3118kN >2...h5 3.Bxf6 Bd6 4.Nxd6 Bxd7 5.Qg5 g6 6.Re1 Rfb8 7.Qh6 > +- (1.56) Depth: 9/40 00:00:20 7927kN >2...Qa1+! > +- (1.53) Depth: 9/40 00:00:23 9173kN >2...Be3+! > +- (1.50) Depth: 9/40 00:00:25 10078kN >2...Be3+! > ± (1.34) Depth: 9/40 00:00:25 10097kN >2...Be3+! > ± (1.03) Depth: 9/40 00:00:25 10127kN >2...Be3+! > ² (0.41) Depth: 9/40 00:00:25 10179kN >2...Be3+ 3.fxe3 Qa1+ 4.Kd2 Qxh1 5.Nh6+ Kh8 6.Nxf7+ Rxf7 7.Rxf7 Qxg2+ 8.Kc1 Kg8 >9.Ne1 Qe2 > = (-0.19) Depth: 9/40 00:00:26 10614kN >2...Bb4! > = (-0.22) Depth: 9/40 00:00:31 12386kN >2...Bb4! > ³ (-0.38) Depth: 9/40 00:00:31 12535kN >2...Bb4 3.Nh6+ Kh8 4.Qxf6 Qa1+ 5.Kd2 gxf6 6.Nxf7+ Kg7 7.Rxa1 Bxd7 8.Bxb4 Rxf7 >9.Kc3 Bg4 10.Nd4 > = (-0.19) Depth: 10/35 00:00:34 13469kN >2...Bb4 3.Nh6+ Kh8 4.Qxf6 Qa1+ 5.Kd2 gxf6 6.Nxf7+ Kg7 7.Rxa1 Bxd7 8.Bxb4 Rxf7 >9.Kc3 Bg4 10.Nd4 > = (-0.19) Depth: 11/35 00:00:51 20713kN >2...Bb4 3.Nh6+ Kh8 4.Qxf6 Qa1+ 5.Kd2 gxf6 6.Nxf7+ Kg7 7.Rxa1 Bxd7 8.Bxb4 Rxf7 >9.Kc3 Be6 10.Nd4 > = (-0.25) Depth: 12/42 00:01:39 41480kN >2...Bb4 3.Nh6+ Kh8 4.Qxf6 Qa1+ 5.Kd2 gxf6 6.Nxf7+ Kg7 7.Rxa1 Bxd7 8.Bxb4 Rxf7 >9.Kc3 Be6 > = (-0.25) Depth: 13/45 00:03:42 94863kN > >(Blass, Tel-Aviv 16.06.2004) Thanks Uli, I can Copy & Paste the Diagrams to a Word Processor, but how do you copy the Fritz analysis as per above? When I try, I can't even highlight it. If you would clarify this, it would make my day, Thanks! BTW the last line showing = is what I got also; that's what I meant about 'saving the game', it doesn't appear to lose. Regardless, Tal, is amazing! > >I also suspect that 3.Nh6+ is wrong and the team of me and Fritz finds >in a few minutes 3.Bxb4 Bxd7 4.Nh6+ Kh8 5.Bc3 Ne4 6.Qxe4 Rae8 7.Qf4 f6 8.Nd2 > >Maybe there are better moves because I did not do serious analysis > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.