Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 09:03:13 06/17/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2004 at 11:58:39, Thomas McBurney wrote: >>> >>>Are you sure that the difference is smaller than 10%. >>> >>>I thought that opteron is always better than athlon(otherwise I do not >>>understand why selling opteron1.8 ghz is 2488$ based on the link when the >>>Athlon64 is significantly cheaper). >>> >>>1.8ghz is more than 10% less than 2.2ghz so your words suggest that >>>athlon64 3200ghz is both cheaper and faster than the opteron244 1.8ghz. >>> >>>If this is the case then what is the reason to buy opteron1.8ghz? >>> >>>I am interested in the number of nodes per second that public movei get in the >>>opening position with the athlon. >>> >>>I remember impressive results of slater with the opteron and I have no idea if >>>the athlon can get close to it. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Here is slater results: >>http://chessprogramming.org/cccsearch/ccc.php?art_id=364613 >> >>Can you get above 600 Knodes per second with athlon64 3200? >> >>Uri > > >Here is what I got with my Athlon XP 3200+ (2.2Ghz)... Over 500Knps > > adjudicate parameter 9999999 hash_in_mbytes=16 >no problem in allocating hash tablesgo > >new >analyse >Error (unknown command): analyse >analyze > 1 35 0 20 b1c3 > 2 9 0 44 b1c3 b8c6 >2 10 0 65 d2d4 > 2 16 0 85 d2d4 b8c6 >2 17 0 120 e2e4 > 2 21 0 140 e2e4 b8c6 > 2 21 0 160 e2e4 b8c6 > 3 40 0 384 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 > 3 40 0 532 e2e4 e7e5 f1c4 > 4 6 0 944 e2e4 e7e5 d1h5 b8c6 > 4 6 0 1664 e2e4 e7e5 d1h5 b8c6 > 5 34 1 4885 e2e4 d7d5 b1c3 g8f6 e4d5 f6d5 f1b5 c7c6 c3d5 d8d5 > 5 34 1 7032 e2e4 d7d5 b1c3 g8f6 e4d5 f6d5 f1b5 c7c6 c3d5 d8d5 > 6 10 3 14087 e2e4 e7e5 b1c3 f8c5 d1g4 g7g5 > 6 10 5 23311 e2e4 e7e5 b1c3 f8c5 d1g4 g7g5 > 7 12 9 44192 e2e4 d7d5 e4e5 b8c6 d2d4 c8f5 b1c3 >7 13 10 49113 d2d4 > 7 30 16 78459 d2d4 e7e6 c1f4 b8c6 g1f3 f8b4 c2c3 b4e7 > 7 30 18 90784 d2d4 e7e6 c1f4 b8c6 g1f3 f8b4 c2c3 b4e7 > 8 9 37 181605 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 d7d5 e2e3 c8g4 f1e2 g4f5 > 8 9 63 315426 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 d7d5 e2e3 c8g4 f1e2 g4f5 > 9 11 90 444793 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 >9 12 153 762455 g1f3 > 9 11 159 793939 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 > 9 11 162 805632 d2d4 g8f6 e2e3 e7e6 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8b4 c1d2 b4d6 > 10 10 255 1259235 d2d4 g8f6 b1c3 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 c1g5 h7h6 g5f4 b8c6 >10 11 347 1724539 b1c3 > 10 18 423 2109301 b1c3 b8c6 d2d4 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 e2e4 d7d5 c1g5 g8e7 > 10 18 506 2506522 b1c3 b8c6 d2d4 e7e6 g1f3 f8b4 e2e4 d7d5 c1g5 g8e7 > 11 15 736 3651695 b1c3 d7d5 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 c1f4 f8b4 e2e3 b4c3 b2c3 b8c6 >11 16 911 4538629 d2d4 > 11 19 1312 6561757 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 b8c6 f1b5 a7a6 b5c6 d7c6 b1c3 > 11 19 1532 7661787 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 b8c6 f1b5 a7a6 b5c6 d7c6 b1c3 > 12 11 3251 16234567 d2d4 g8f6 g1f3 e7e6 e2e3 d7d5 b1c3 f8b4 f3e5 e8g8 a2a3 b4a5 > >12 12 4237 21186012 e2e4 > 12 16 6105 30890142 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8c5 d2d3 g8e7 e1g1 e8g8 b1c3 d7d6 > > 12 16 7376 37360686 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 b8c6 f1b5 f8c5 d2d3 g8e7 e1g1 e8g8 b1c3 d7d6 > > 13 12 11743 60019447 e2e4 e7e5 g1f3 g8f6 b1c3 b8c6 f1c4 f6e4 c3e4 d7d5 c4b5 d5e >4 b5c6 b7c6 f3e5 500knps seems a bit slow for a AMD 64 clocked with 2.2 GHZ. Are you sure you don't have an 3200+ whith 1024 KB 2nd level cache which is clocked with 2.0 GHz? regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.