Author: Daniel Jackson
Date: 11:22:24 06/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2004 at 12:10:18, Ed Trice wrote: >>My point is you >>haven't made a new game, you have made changes that have been made before, maybe >>a little different, but not much. >> >>I've seen superior versions of Fairy Chess. > > >So changing something to produce something that has not existed is not creating >something new? In this case not really, it's all been done before, you have made slight changes to make your version different. But a new game? I don't think so. > >When a baby is born, is it just a rehashing of an "old idea", or is it referred >to as a "newborn"? Oh please.... > >'Superior' is a subjective interpretation. It all depends on your preference. >With over 30,000 sets out there right now, and fewer than 80,000 members of the >United States Chess Federation, the arguments about Gothic Chess being just some >weird offshoot is starting to lose merit. There are over 300,000,000 chess players world wide. Most have never heard of Gothic Chess, most wouldn't care. See if the top 100 FIDE players care:) If you really want chess with a punch try.....:) But that would be telling;-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.