Author: Robert Ericsson
Date: 03:55:56 12/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 21, 1998 at 10:05:44, Kim Hvarre wrote: >On December 21, 1998 at 08:07:15, Robert Ericsson wrote: > >>How many of the members are active testers? Not that many I guess... The drop of >>membership from 600 to 300 are (my guess) mostly due to less subscribers to the >>mag PLY. Right or wrong? Anyone who knows? >> >>Robert Ericsson > > >Being a member of SSDF is pretty much the same as subscribing to Ply. The >magazine was the incitament. The list something (before the net;) printed in the >magazine (later one could subscribe to the list only, as I recall it, get via a >BBS - but the membership was/is closely connected to Ply. Thus my former idea to >publish it in english. And e.g. 8-10 years ago it was a very interessting >publication - to day - well, se my former message. > >Regarding the (very) active testers, I think it was/is about 15-20, can't find >the old numbers right here. > >regards, > >kim Just a clarification: I meant that a lot of people became members of the SSDF solely because of the subscribtion of the mag PLY and not because of they wanted to become testers. What you state above seems to verify this hypothesis!? Well, I will try to get in contact with the webmaster of SSDF and try to solve things out. Not much point in continuing guessing when someone might have the answers already :-) Robert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.