Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 14:31:26 06/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2004 at 17:01:35, mike tubbs wrote: >On June 18, 2004 at 16:18:12, Daniel Jackson wrote: > >>On June 18, 2004 at 14:35:48, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On June 18, 2004 at 14:31:56, Daniel Jackson wrote: >>> >>>>On June 18, 2004 at 13:25:50, mike tubbs wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The author of this amazing engine in my opinion has created a style very >>>>>similar to Mikhail Tal and Garry Kasparov. Has anyone else noticed this? One of >>>>>the Signitures of CM6000 style is the pawn sacrifice, which is usually for >>>>>active piece play. Many here speak of Rebel and Hiarcs as the most human like >>>>>programs, actually i think CM6000 deserves this singular honour. I also like >>>>>CM9000 but it plays alot less risky then CM6000 and doesn't sacrifice material >>>>>as much. >>>> >>>>You know that Johan de Koning wrote 4000, 5000, 6000, 8000, and 9000, all based >>>>on the King program, don't you? >>> >>>Don't forget 5500, 7000 and the upcoming 10th Edition. :-) >>> >>>But that doesn't mean that there couldn't have been significant changes in the >>>playing style of the engine between versions. >>> >>>jm >> >>Oh I didn't forget, there was a small upgrade between 5000, and 5500. CM7K was >>basically 6K with a new interface. >> >>I think Chessmaster/King Program is very tactical, one of the best and the King >>of spotting mates, but not the most human of all engines and certainly not Tal.. >>it would get into trouble with unsound sacs!;-) >> >>Daniel > > > I guess it's just a matter of opinion, I think it's better then tal and didn't >make the same unsound sacrifices he did, if tal was to play his crap on >chessmaster he would have gotten rolled, but i'm sure he is smart enough not to >try his crap against it. His crap?????? You are kidding right?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.