Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:44:02 06/18/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2004 at 18:40:50, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >The following computerchess experts give attention to the WM test (which was so >controversely discussed here) on their websites, have linked to it or are >offering downloads for it: > >The North American Computer Chess Association >(by endgame tables pioneer Steven J. Edwards): >http://homepage.mac.com/chessnotation/TSD.html > >CSS, a german computerchess magazine >(which has reported about the test in five print issues): >http://www.computerschach.de/test/index.htm > >The WinBoard Forum, presenting M.Meiler in it's gallery: >http://bilder11.parsimony.net/forum16635/mmeiler.html > >M.Pillen, a computerchess expert of Germany >(has run a large tournament based on the test positions): >http://www.mpillen.de/Mapi/WM_Test_100/wm_test_100.html > >A.Schwartmann, another computerchess expert of Germany: >http://www.andreas-schwartmann.de/chess.html > >Alexander Schmidt, expert for UCI engines: >http://www.uciengines.de/ > >If YOU are featuring the WM test on your homepage too, please add your URL to >the list. I guess you wouldn't link to a test which you consider to be flawed, >invalid and useless! :-) Begging the question >Let's re-install some common sense again here, by that. I have it on my ftp site in the EPD directory, of course. Every EPD test is flawed, except those that Chest or some other formal proving system has definitely shown as totally correct.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.