Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: "Pre-patent exemption"

Author: Ed Trice

Date: 18:11:54 06/18/04

Go up one level in this thread



>
>I hope that somebody will really take his(her) chances with you in court and
>that you are going to lose.
>
>Justice simply tells me that you should lose but I am not expert in law.
>I do not know about previous case when somebody won in court about similiar
>case.
>
>I see no difference between this and a patent about the following position:
>
>
>bn1qkbnr/1p1p1p1p/r7/p1p1p1p1/P1P1P1P1/R7/1P1P1P1P/BN1QKBNR w Kk
>
>A lot of programs can play it inspite of the fact that they were not design for
>this position so for the same reason it is logical that a program for Capablaca
>chess will be able to play gothic chess.
>
>If you can complain about a program that can play gothic chess another person
>can also complain about many programs that can play the position that I posted.
>


You are absurd.

Two companies have already taken, and lost, that gamble.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.