Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:07:47 06/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2004 at 07:27:40, Jonas Bylund wrote: >>Not a punk but a psychologist with studies in test theory & practice of course. >>Your perception sucks. > >Considering how much time you spend on computer chess, it is incredible that you >never seem to miss the chance to mention that you are a psychologist... >This leads me to believe that you are not at all interested in computer chess, >but to argue with clever people about the psychology behind computer chess?!, in >other words, you could be posting at any forum with any topic as long as the >people there are clever, infact i would not be surprised if you already do this, >mind you without contributing to the topics, but rather the "psychology" behind >it all. > >BTW your titles does not automatically render his perception skills void, being >a psychologist does not mean that you can't be a punk :) > >Jonas Now you're doing exactly what you accused me to do. This is funny. But I won't bite. Surprised? :)) Next time if you appeared in a real debate, then I would well want to address your ideas. Till then have fun.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.