Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:58:39 06/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2004 at 08:17:18, Joachim Rang wrote: >On June 19, 2004 at 05:56:46, Robert Allgeuer wrote: > >> >>I am currently running a small test tournement with Fruit 1.5 against various >>engines. Arena reports for Fruit consistently a comparatively low hash hit rate >>of 5-7%. Certainly my time control for this test is very short (2m+1, Athlon >>XP2400+), but other engines report under the same conditions significantly >>higher hit percentages (Patzer 85%, Ruffian around 50%, Anmon 40-50% etc.). >>Any ideas why? >> >>Thanks >>Robert > >I don't think it is possible to view the hash hits in Arena. I doubt that any >engine regularily reports them. YOu probably mean the hash table usage >percentage. That means how many percent of the allocated hash tables are already >filled. Fruit is relatively slow in filling them compared to Ruffian or Anmon. > >regards Joachim Movei has no knowledge how many pervent are already filled. It is a slow searcher and also does not use hash in the qsearch when significant number of nodes are in the qsearch because it does checks in the qsearch so I guess that it is relatively slow to other programs in filling the table. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.