Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Hash hit != Hash full

Author: Andreas Herrmann

Date: 09:11:12 06/19/04

Go up one level in this thread

On June 19, 2004 at 11:59:31, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On June 19, 2004 at 11:40:54, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
>
>>At first you can't compare the values, because AFAIK there is no definition
>>inside the UCI protocol, what to output there. So only the author of an engine
>>knows, what he sends there to the GUI.
>
>* hashfull <x>
>the hash is x permill full, the engine should send this info regularly
>
>Hash hits are not the same as the hash being full. You can have a full
>hash and still get no hits.
>
>--
>GCP

please read my posting carefully. I'm speaking from "hash fill rate", and not
from hash hit rate. And there is no hit rate output inside the UCI protocol. I
think the orginal poster, just mismatched that.

Andreas

• Re: Hash hit != Hash full Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:19:42 06/19/04
• Re: Hash hit != Hash full Robert Allgeuer 09:19:02 06/19/04
  • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Tord Romstad 09:35:10 06/19/04
  • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:23:15 06/19/04
    • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Sune Fischer 10:39:47 06/19/04
      • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Gian-Carlo Pascutto 10:45:59 06/19/04
        • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Sune Fischer 11:07:31 06/19/04
          • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Gian-Carlo Pascutto 11:26:35 06/19/04
            • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Sune Fischer 11:48:25 06/19/04
    • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Andreas Herrmann 09:38:56 06/19/04
      • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:47:13 06/19/04
        • Re: Hash hit != Hash full Andreas Herrmann 10:13:11 06/19/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.