Author: Harald Faber
Date: 06:49:33 12/22/98
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 1998 at 09:23:15, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>>b) Knew of Sean's bogus accounts. >> >>Why should CW be responsible for SE bogus accounts??? >If you would prefer a less "I am my brother's keeper" approach, consider that in >the jurisdictions I am aware of, it is a criminal act to have knowledge of a >criminal act and not to inform the authorities. (I am not saying that Chris >committed a criminal act. It's just an analogy.) That is a bad analogy. We are not talking of crime. >I do think that if Chris was genuinely concerned about the legitimacy of the >upcoming CCC moderator elections, he would have notified either ICD or one of >the moderators so that action could have been taken. If he took this step, and >I just am not aware about it (because I am not "well-connected" or because that >is supposed to be a secret or whatever :), then I would say "thanks, Chris" to Why should he? He was banned from CCC so you can't expect some kind of "thanks" from him. >And, for the record, it's my opinion that if (and only if) both Chris and Sean >were members in good standing at the time of Sean's nomination of Chris, then >the nomination should have been allowed to stand. I don't know if Chris is a >member in good standing or not, that is actually a complete question mark to me. AFAIK Chris was and still is a banned member, as far as I understand it one would say "no member" because user name exists but no entry allowed. >Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.