Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Talks and Being Right

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 12:31:49 06/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 19, 2004 at 14:24:27, Jonas Bylund wrote:

>On June 19, 2004 at 13:10:28, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>There is something wrong with you. I was in a debate about a false ptretention
>>for the CSS WM Test in combination with censorship in the CSS forum. Then you
>>come and ask me if I would think  that I were always right. This is funny. No
>>arguments but such a trivial question. This is telling. It's an interesting
>>topic but totally off topic here and therefore lets stop it. In the case of the
>>CSS test I'm certainly right. Don't worry.
>
>I suggest you go back and read my initial reply to your post:
>
>"Not a punk but a psychologist with studies in test theory & practice of course.
>Your perception sucks."
>
>Not at one point did i mention the discussion on the CSS test, i only replied to
>the above quoted post, if you thought i did then that's telling :)


Yes, telling for my smartness and politeness. I was writing to Glanzfeld who
insulted me. Did I insult? No. But you had only a single question: could a
psychologist still be a punk. Important question, my dear. Let's now stop this
conversation. We will hopefully meet again in one of the next topics. Ok?



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.