Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Cliques and claques

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 12:36:59 06/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 19, 2004 at 13:27:07, Lars Bremer wrote:

>On June 19, 2004 at 09:12:32, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>Lars,
>>
>>nice to meet you. Why Mike was so upset when you just gave us the exact position
>>of the WM-Test authors statements in 2001? he wrote "Good team work :((". Don't
>>you think that it were better if the truth and facts could be better protected
>>in the CSS forum? And is it really so good to belong to a clique of mere
>>applause? Isn't it better to protect the category of criticism?
>>
>>Rolf
>
>Hi Rolf,
>
>I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
>
>ciao
>Lars


Lars,

thanks for your friendly reply. I repeat, Michael Scheidl answered you on your
message in CSS with the exact position of the quote that WM-Test was meant to
measure strength. 05/01.

Mike wrote a message with a seperate header and no text body. The header line
was into your direction:

+++ Good teamwork! +++ and after that adding a negative smiley :((

Hours later that message was deleted.

The message was in red, so there is no doubt that it was from the team member
Scheidl.



Hope this helps,

Rolf



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.