Author: Lars Bremer
Date: 12:56:26 06/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2004 at 15:36:59, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>On June 19, 2004 at 13:27:07, Lars Bremer wrote:
>
>>On June 19, 2004 at 09:12:32, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>>Lars,
>>>
>>>nice to meet you. Why Mike was so upset when you just gave us the exact position
>>>of the WM-Test authors statements in 2001? he wrote "Good team work :((". Don't
>>>you think that it were better if the truth and facts could be better protected
>>>in the CSS forum? And is it really so good to belong to a clique of mere
>>>applause? Isn't it better to protect the category of criticism?
>>>
>>>Rolf
>>
>>Hi Rolf,
>>
>>I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
>>
>>ciao
>>Lars
>
>
>Lars,
>
>thanks for your friendly reply. I repeat, Michael Scheidl answered you on your
>message in CSS with the exact position of the quote that WM-Test was meant to
>measure strength. 05/01.
>
>Mike wrote a message with a seperate header and no text body. The header line
>was into your direction:
>
>+++ Good teamwork! +++ and after that adding a negative smiley :((
>
>Hours later that message was deleted.
>
>The message was in red, so there is no doubt that it was from the team member
>Scheidl.
>
>
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>Rolf
Hi Rolf,
I didn't know that, but surely you wouldn't lie to me and so I believe you.
But what do you expect from me? Do you expect that I can explain something about
CSS forum and its moderators? Even if I could I wouldn't do it, but I can't. I
am not a moderator. Why don't you ask Michael about his messages?
ciao
Lars
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.