Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:08:31 06/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2004 at 15:56:26, Lars Bremer wrote:
>On June 19, 2004 at 15:36:59, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On June 19, 2004 at 13:27:07, Lars Bremer wrote:
>>
>>>On June 19, 2004 at 09:12:32, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>Lars,
>>>>
>>>>nice to meet you. Why Mike was so upset when you just gave us the exact position
>>>>of the WM-Test authors statements in 2001? he wrote "Good team work :((". Don't
>>>>you think that it were better if the truth and facts could be better protected
>>>>in the CSS forum? And is it really so good to belong to a clique of mere
>>>>applause? Isn't it better to protect the category of criticism?
>>>>
>>>>Rolf
>>>
>>>Hi Rolf,
>>>
>>>I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
>>>
>>>ciao
>>>Lars
>>
>>
>>Lars,
>>
>>thanks for your friendly reply. I repeat, Michael Scheidl answered you on your
>>message in CSS with the exact position of the quote that WM-Test was meant to
>>measure strength. 05/01.
>>
>>Mike wrote a message with a seperate header and no text body. The header line
>>was into your direction:
>>
>>+++ Good teamwork! +++ and after that adding a negative smiley :((
>>
>>Hours later that message was deleted.
>>
>>The message was in red, so there is no doubt that it was from the team member
>>Scheidl.
>>
>>
>>
>>Hope this helps,
>>
>>Rolf
>
>Hi Rolf,
>
>I didn't know that, but surely you wouldn't lie to me and so I believe you.
>
>But what do you expect from me? Do you expect that I can explain something about
>CSS forum and its moderators? Even if I could I wouldn't do it, but I can't. I
>am not a moderator. Why don't you ask Michael about his messages?
>
>ciao
>Lars
No, it's ok. Off topic here. Even if I wanted, I couldn't contact Mike because I
am censored there and dont know the email address of any moderator. The whole
information is just a proof for my theory that CSS forum and team is not open to
the truth but it's biased towards ChessBase and CSS journal and its interest.
That is the difference to CCC where the host does never show his commercial
interests. Here the truth can be discussed. It could be expressed. In CSS even
the proof of the truth wouldn't be allowed to be mentioned if the CSS team
wouldn't like that. - This is the fallacy with the CSS support of this WM-test
too. Gurevich has the freedom to attack and insult while the direction against
him is forbidden...
It's an important topic but we should end it now. It's all known by now and that
is what's important.
My main point to you was the hope that you realised that it could be a
disadvantage to write as a resident in CSS forum - because one supports the
censorship of them. But if the critical moment hasn't come yet for you it's also
ok for me.
I wish you a nice weekend,
Rolf
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.