Author: Lars Bremer
Date: 13:50:54 06/19/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 19, 2004 at 16:08:31, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>On June 19, 2004 at 15:56:26, Lars Bremer wrote:
>
>>On June 19, 2004 at 15:36:59, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>>On June 19, 2004 at 13:27:07, Lars Bremer wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 19, 2004 at 09:12:32, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Lars,
>>>>>
>>>>>nice to meet you. Why Mike was so upset when you just gave us the exact position
>>>>>of the WM-Test authors statements in 2001? he wrote "Good team work :((". Don't
>>>>>you think that it were better if the truth and facts could be better protected
>>>>>in the CSS forum? And is it really so good to belong to a clique of mere
>>>>>applause? Isn't it better to protect the category of criticism?
>>>>>
>>>>>Rolf
>>>>
>>>>Hi Rolf,
>>>>
>>>>I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
>>>>
>>>>ciao
>>>>Lars
>>>
>>>
>>>Lars,
>>>
>>>thanks for your friendly reply. I repeat, Michael Scheidl answered you on your
>>>message in CSS with the exact position of the quote that WM-Test was meant to
>>>measure strength. 05/01.
>>>
>>>Mike wrote a message with a seperate header and no text body. The header line
>>>was into your direction:
>>>
>>>+++ Good teamwork! +++ and after that adding a negative smiley :((
>>>
>>>Hours later that message was deleted.
>>>
>>>The message was in red, so there is no doubt that it was from the team member
>>>Scheidl.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Hope this helps,
>>>
>>>Rolf
>>
>>Hi Rolf,
>>
>>I didn't know that, but surely you wouldn't lie to me and so I believe you.
>>
>>But what do you expect from me? Do you expect that I can explain something about
>>CSS forum and its moderators? Even if I could I wouldn't do it, but I can't. I
>>am not a moderator. Why don't you ask Michael about his messages?
>>
>>ciao
>>Lars
>
>
>No, it's ok. Off topic here. Even if I wanted, I couldn't contact Mike because I
>am censored there and dont know the email address of any moderator. The whole
>information is just a proof for my theory that CSS forum and team is not open to
>the truth but it's biased towards ChessBase and CSS journal and its interest.
>That is the difference to CCC where the host does never show his commercial
>interests. Here the truth can be discussed. It could be expressed. In CSS even
>the proof of the truth wouldn't be allowed to be mentioned if the CSS team
>wouldn't like that. - This is the fallacy with the CSS support of this WM-test
>too. Gurevich has the freedom to attack and insult while the direction against
>him is forbidden...
I disagree.
>My main point to you was the hope that you realised that it could be a
>disadvantage to write as a resident in CSS forum - because one supports the
>censorship of them. But if the critical moment hasn't come yet for you it's also
>ok for me.
Well, sorry, maybe this critical moment comes later. I'll let you know it then.
>I wish you a nice weekend,
>Rolf
Thx, u2.
ciao
Lars
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.