Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Talks and Being Right

Author: Jonas Bylund

Date: 14:51:23 06/19/04

Go up one level in this thread


>Yes, telling for my smartness and politeness. I was writing to Glanzfeld who
>insulted me. Did I insult? No. But you had only a single question: could a
>psychologist still be a punk. Important question, my dear. Let's now stop this
>conversation. We will hopefully meet again in one of the next topics. Ok?

Well if you thought i was talking about a completely different topic when i
never made any mention of it, i am not sure that it is telling for your
smartness...

No i never posed a question, i stated a fact, that your titles or anybody elses
titles for that matter does not make them clear of being wrong or a punk even.

Also you said that based on :"Not a punk but a psychologist with studies in test
theory & practice of course.Your perception sucks."

That to me is insulting, but you are right he insulted you first, but that does
not make you right.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.