Author: Steve Glanzfeld
Date: 10:42:59 06/20/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2004 at 12:10:57, David Dahlem wrote: >On June 19, 2004 at 12:02:19, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >>Users are interested in the engine's performances in such tests, simply. >>Assingning ratings certainly isn't the main thing. Most often it is sufficient >>to count and compare the number of solutions. >I've seen numerous examples of one engine solving a test suite position in a few >seconds, while another engine of known equal game playing strength never finds >the solution, even after hours of analysis. To me, this makes test suites >worthless, or at least very difficult to interpret the results. As long as your test suites consist of ONLY ONE SINGLE POSITION, you're right :))) Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.