Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: ChrisW Nomination correct or not

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:01:42 12/22/98

Go up one level in this thread


On December 22, 1998 at 11:44:35, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>On December 22, 1998 at 03:33:01, Dan Kiski wrote:
>
>>On December 22, 1998 at 03:24:30, Harald Faber wrote:
>>
>>>On December 21, 1998 at 12:31:54, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>>>
>>>>>The most important quesiton is was CW MEMBER of CCC at that time? If not there
>>>>>is no reason to allow this nomination. If yes...someone may judge regarding rgcc
>>>>>posts...
>>>>
>>>>There is the question of whether he's a member at that time.
>>>
>>>That is what I asked in the 1st line. Therre must be a clear answer.
>>>
>>It is not relevant anyway, Chris just by reading all the posts was:
>>a) Not nominated in time.
>
>He was clearly nominated in time.  He was nominated on the 16th, the last day.
>
>>b) Knew of Sean's bogus accounts.
>
>Not necessarily a big deal.
>
>The big question is whether someone who is banned is eligible to be a moderator.
>
>>Therefore regardless of if he were a member or not the latest list of moderator
>>candidates don't bear his name and therefore he has clearly been excluded.
>>
>>>>There is also a question of whether a banned member can be a moderator.
>>>
>>>For me this is no question.
>>
>>For me as well, but just to make sure...to my mind no banned member should be
>>allowed to run for moderator without having been re-instated and proved his
>>interest in participating in CCC.
>
>A perfectly fine argument.
>
>bruce


In addition, a member with nearly 100 accounts should have any nomination he
made thrown out anyway, because of the obvious intent to defraud the rest of us
that cast only one vote per member.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.