Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:40:39 06/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 21, 2004 at 20:47:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 21, 2004 at 18:32:21, Jaime Benito de Valle Ruiz wrote: > >>>What Crafty version are you running? all the recent versions see that this is >>>winning for black instantly, starting at ply=1: >>> >>> depth time score variation (1) >>> 1 0.00 -5.73 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 >>> 1-> 0.00 -5.73 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 >>> 2 0.00 -5.83 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 >>> 2-> 0.00 -5.83 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 >>> 3 0.00 -1 1. ... Qxd5 >>> 3 0.00 -5.38 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. d6 >>> 3-> 0.01 -5.38 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. d6 >>> 4 0.01 -5.68 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. d6 Kf7 >>> 4-> 0.01 -5.68 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. d6 Kf7 >>> >> >>(around 1 Gnode/sec) >> >>b: Crafty-19.3 WB2 5 MB: >> 7 00:00 -0.70 1. ... Qe2+ 2. Kg5 Qe7+ 3. Kg4 Kh7 4. Qh5+ Kg8 5. Qg6 Qe2+ 6. >>Kg3 a4 7. Qxb6 Qxc4 >> 8 00:00 -0.64 1. ... Qe2+ 2. Kg3 Qe8 3. Kf3 a4 4. Qd6 Qh5+ 5. Ke4 Qe2+ 6. >>Kf5 Qe3 >> 8 00:00 -0.70 1. ... Qg6+ 2. Kf3 Kh7 3. c5 bxc5 4. Qxc5 Qd3+ 5. Kf2 Qd2+ 6. >>Kg3 a4 >> 9 00:00 -0.66 1. ... Qg6+ 2. Kf3 Kh7 3. c5 bxc5 4. Qxc5 a4 5. Qa3 Qc6+ 6. >>Ke3 Kg6 >> 9 00:00 -0.68 1. ... Qe2+ 2. Kg3 Qe8 3. Kf2 a4 4. c5 bxc5 5. Qxc5 Kh7 6. >>Qg5 >>10 00:02 -0.73 1. ... Qe2+ 2. Kg3 Qe7 3. h5 Kh7 4. Qf5+ Kg8 5. Kf3 Qf7 6. >>Qe5 Kh7 7. Qe4+ Kh6 >>11 00:07 -0.77 1. ... Qe2+ 2. Kg3 Qe8 3. Kf2 a4 4. c5 bxc5 5. Qxc5 Kh7 6. h5 >>Qe4 7. Qg5 >>11 00:10 -0.80 1. ... Qe8 2. Qd6 Qc8+ 3. Kf3 Qxc4 4. Qxb6 a4 5. Qb8+ Kh7 6. >>Qb1+ g6 7. Qb7+ Kh6 8. Qe7 Qd4 >>12 00:17 -0.84 1. ... Qe8 2. Kg5 a4 3. c5 Qe7+ 4. Kg4 Qe2+ 5. Kg5 bxc5 6. >>Qxc5 Qg2+ 7. Kf5 Qg3 8. Ke5 Qxh4 >>13 00:35 -0.88 1. ... Qe8 2. Kg3 a4 3. c5 Qe3+ 4. Kg4 Qg1+ 5. Kh3 Qf1+ 6. >>Kg4 Qe2+ 7. Kg5 bxc5 8. Qa8+ Kh7 <HT> >>13 00:38 -1.24 1. ... Qxd5!! >>13 00:38 -2.37 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. h5 a4 4. f5 a3 5. d6 Kf7 6. d7 Ke7 >>7. f6+ gxf6 8. d8=Q+ Kxd8 9. h6 >>14 00:38 -2.77 1. ... Qxd5!! >>14 00:39 -3.10 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. Kf5 Kf7 4. Ke5 a4 5. Kd4 a3 6. Kc3 >>Ke7 7. h5 a2 8. Kb2 Kd6 9. Kxa2 Kxd5 >>15 00:41 -3.08 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. Kf5 Kf7 4. Ke4 a4 5. Kd3 a3 6. Kc2 >>Ke7 7. f5 a2 8. Kb2 Kd6 9. f6 >>16 00:41 -3.48 1. ... Qxd5!! >>16 00:43 -5.79 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. Kf5 a4 4. Ke6 Kf8 5. d6 Ke8 6. Kd5 >>a3 7. Kc6 Kd8 8. Kxb6 Kd7 9. Kc5 >>17 00:43 -6.19 1. ... Qxd5!! >>17 00:44 -6.76 1. ... Qxd5 2. cxd5 Kg8 3. Kf5 a4 4. Ke6 Kf8 5. d6 Ke8 6. Kd5 >>a3 7. Kc6 Kd8 8. f5 a2 9. h5 a1=Q 10. Kxb6 >> >>Do I have a bad version???? >>Regards, >> >> Jaime > >Yes you do. Normal version realizes black is winning at -5.5 after one ply and >it doesn't get any worse... My opinion is that -5.5 is too good for black because you get it also for the following position when white is winning. [D]7k/8/1p4p1/p2P4/5P1P/6K1/8/8 b - - 0 1 You should give a smaller bonus for uunstoppable passed pawn in case that the unstoppable passed pawn is not more advanced than the most advanced enemy pawn. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.