Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:01:37 06/22/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2004 at 17:53:10, Franz Hagra wrote: >>For using this test suite “WM-Test” and to avoid >>misunderstandings/misinterpretations of my test results I recommend to look at >>the attached “readme.txt”. > >Only missing point is a little about the significancy of the figures! > >Hagra I think that they think that the support from CSS is significance enough. This is the same with the false public relations by ChessBase when they quote SSDF results and rankings as if that had any specific value. This is here in the same tradition. Hoax, nothing but hoax. If now someone feels unhappy let me explain that test results without significance, without validity, without reliability - - that then they are worthless. That's so simple and easy to understand. Finally as a footnote, it is extremely false to appear here in this forum, dropping such nonsense results without any value and then quickly chicken out. "No, with you I can't debate here - because I have lost my arguments" - nonsense - there are no arguments to defend the WM test of CSS.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.