Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The WM test doesn't need defense.

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 01:04:12 06/23/04

Go up one level in this thread


On June 22, 2004 at 18:18:04, Steve Glanzfeld wrote:

>On June 22, 2004 at 18:01:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>- there are no arguments to defend the WM test of CSS.
>
>Two or three people OUT OF THOUSANDS of computerchess software users are
>permanently attacking the WM test. THIS is insignificant, so there's in fact no
>defense necessary at all! :)) Keep on piffling...
>
>Some programmers made their remarks about testing too, but that their viewpoint
>MUST be different from the one of a typical user, is no surprise at all. It's
>just a pity that they don't seem to understand the user's viewpoints and needs,
>and how they like to do engine research. Programmers should understand that
>users are not developers, and that tests are not designed exclusively for
>programmers :)) (I guess there are some more clever ones who have understood
>that anyway :) these who don't participate in that crazy parody...)

Mike your permanent usage of smilies in context, when smilies
are definetely displaced, is boring.(and somehow strange)
Moreover you left that place with the same 'rotten CCC' talk,
as you do now as *Steve Glanzfeld*.
Why dont you just return to your calm and superior CSS, when
you are that frustrated by the behaviour from CCC posters?

Günther



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.