Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Insignificance of the CSS WM test of Meiler, Schumacher & Gurevi

Author: Bernhard Bauer

Date: 02:24:46 06/23/04

On June 23, 2004 at 05:10:02, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On June 23, 2004 at 03:01:36, Bernhard Bauer wrote:
>>could you explain the value of such a formula?
>>
>> Ha, ha!
>>The exel table is fantastic. So much work which makes so little sense!
>>Incredible!
>>regards
>
>many things in life make no sense. can you explain to me why mercedes produces a
>car that is incapable to drive in a corner without the help of electrical
>modules ?
>
>shouldn't a car drive in all kind of stages, without computer help ?
>a car that falls on the top when the computer gets a crash !
>
>life is full of those examples.
>
>i would not say that the WM-test is nonsense. maybe the formula is not the best.
>but why is the work of the people nonsense ?
>
>IMO i see much more nonsense when i see germans wash their cars :-))

Here are some mercedes products you may want to wash!

2.711
2.709
2.704
2.702
2.699
2.699
2.698
2.698
2.698
2.697
2.696
2.695
2.695
2.694
2.692
2.691
2.691
2.691
2.690
2.689
2.687
2.686
2.686
2.686
2.686
2.685
2.685
2.685
2.684
2.684
2.683
2.682
2.681
2.681
2.681
2.681
2.681
2.680
2.680
2.679
2.679
2.679
2.677
2.676
2.676
2.675
2.675
2.674
2.674
2.673
2.672
2.671
2.670
2.670
2.670
2.670
2.669
2.668
2.668
2.667
2.667
2.667
2.666
2.666
2.666
2.666
2.666
2.665
2.665
2.665
2.662
2.662
2.661
2.660
2.660
2.660
2.659
2.659
2.658
2.658
2.658
2.657
2.657
2.657
2.657
2.657
2.656
2.655
2.655
2.655
2.654
2.654
2.654
2.653
2.653
2.653
2.653
2.652
2.651
2.651
2.651
2.650
2.650
2.650
2.650
2.650
2.649
2.649
2.647
2.646
2.646
2.646
2.646
2.645
2.644
2.644
2.644
2.644
2.643
2.643
2.643
2.643
2.642
2.642
2.642
2.642
2.641
2.640
2.640
2.640
2.639
2.639
2.639
2.639
2.639
2.638
2.638
2.637
2.637
2.637
2.636
2.635
2.635
2.635
2.634
2.634
2.634
2.634
2.634
2.632
2.632
2.632
2.631
2.631
2.630
2.630
2.630
2.629
2.629
2.628
2.627
2.627
2.626
2.625
2.624
2.624
2.624
2.623
2.621
2.620
2.620
2.619
2.619
2.619
2.619
2.619
2.618
2.618
2.618
2.616
2.616
2.616
2.616
2.616
2.615
2.615
2.614
2.614
2.614
2.614
2.614
2.614
2.614
2.613
2.613
2.613
2.613
2.612
2.610
2.609
2.607
2.607
2.606
2.605
2.605
2.605
2.605
2.604
2.604
2.604
2.603
2.603
2.603
2.602
2.601
2.601
2.600
2.598
2.598
2.597
2.597
2.597
2.597
2.596
2.596
2.596
2.595
2.592
2.591
2.591
2.590
2.589
2.589
2.589
2.587
2.587
2.586
2.582
2.582
2.581
2.581
2.581
2.580
2.579
2.577
2.573
2.572
2.570
2.570
2.569
2.569
2.567
2.567
2.565
2.556
2.556
2.553
2.551
2.549
2.535

And this is only the first row.
Feel free to see some sense in those numbers. Hint: numbers are from a test set
and each number represents 33 hours computer time.

regards
Bernhard

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.