Author: Tony Werten
Date: 02:50:48 06/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 22, 2004 at 18:01:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On June 22, 2004 at 17:53:10, Franz Hagra wrote: > >>>For using this test suite “WM-Test” and to avoid >>>misunderstandings/misinterpretations of my test results I recommend to look at >>>the attached “readme.txt”. >> >>Only missing point is a little about the significancy of the figures! >> >>Hagra > > >I think that they think that the support from CSS is significance enough. This >is the same with the false public relations by ChessBase when they quote SSDF >results and rankings as if that had any specific value. This is here in the same >tradition. Hoax, nothing but hoax. > >If now someone feels unhappy let me explain that test results without >significance, without validity, without reliability - - that then they are >worthless. That's so simple and easy to understand. You're to unfriendly. It does give reliable and significant results. Just as long as the only question is "How well does a program score on this test". :) Tony > >Finally as a footnote, it is extremely false to appear here in this forum, >dropping such nonsense results without any value and then quickly chicken out. > >"No, with you I can't debate here - because I have lost my arguments" - nonsense >- there are no arguments to defend the WM test of CSS.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.