Author: Fabien Letouzey
Date: 06:27:16 06/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2004 at 09:24:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 23, 2004 at 09:19:17, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >>All checks + single replies. Remember I don't use fractional-ply extensions. >Does it mean that fruit's search may explode when there are a lot of checks that >force a single reply and that Fruit may find mate in 30 at depth 1 when all the >moves before the mate are checks that force a single reply? >Uri Yes and yes. I think it is useful for perpetual checks. Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.