Author: Mathieu Pagé
Date: 17:03:34 06/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2004 at 12:50:04, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On June 23, 2004 at 10:53:42, Peter Ackermann wrote: > >>>However I would >>>want to be interested if a German forum moderator or CSS team member would have >>>comitted suicide because of a computerchess issue. But as far as I know this >>>didn't happen so far. >> >>Vry bad taste to even consider such a question!! >>As one moderator of a German forum (Schachwerkstatt) I can assure you that >>computerchess is a hobby but not a question of life and death!! >> >>Peter > > >Peter, > >long time ago you informed me about being a sociologist. But if that is true, >you shouldn't take quotes out of context. Here I would never ask such questions >out of the blue, but the truth is that it was "just" a comparison. So, my >insinuation was NOT if someone could have comitted suicide at all but I wanted >to clarify what were interesting IF at all. But _color_ wouldn't be interesting. >That you are a mod yourself shows well on what intellectual level German fora >are living. Either you misread me or you wanted intentiously do me harm. Don't >worry people here in that international forum will know what you did. In both >cases you should apologize to me. But also this is not what you can do just >easily. Let's see how you will react. > >But there is still another aspect that the readers here should know. > >I agree with you that we are all in a hobby here and not war and death games. > >But if this is true, Peter, could you just explain why both CSS and also the >famous non-commercial (haha) clique of Frank Qui. don't allow my participation? >What exactly did I do to CSS forum members or the clique members of the ARENA >forums, that the CSS team and also Quisinsky censor me? I can give you a partial >answer: I did NEVER write anything hostile or insultive to any member of either >CSS or ARENA. Why then the whole censorship. I can tell you another aspect. >Thorsten Czub certainly isn't really a friend of mine. He does even accuse me of >strange things at times, but in his forum he's democrat enough to tolerate my >"sachliche" Messages. > >Isn't isn't allowed then to conclude that in our scenery or field we have some >people who have not yet left their puberal period and who fight magic war games >with ghoast enemies? Here in CCC Quisinsky didn't even give me the correct >address for the ARENA topics, as if it were a secret secte. Why? If this is just >about a hobby! Is it my fault that I am studied and that I therefore can >criticise test practices? Is that a reason to censor people? > >You are the sociologist, so you have the knowledge to explain such nonsense and >such scapegoating of more or less weakly educated people. > >But probably you didn't come here into this free discussion forum for >computerchess to debate about computerchess related questions but you came to >deop your opinion and then to chicken out like the CSS-WM-Test authors. So you >are immune against further questions. > >Nice "hobby" activists... NOT.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.