Author: James T. Walker
Date: 17:24:54 06/23/04
Go up one level in this thread
On June 23, 2004 at 12:05:19, John Merlino wrote: >On June 23, 2004 at 11:28:56, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On June 23, 2004 at 09:39:34, Lin Harper wrote: >> >>> Has Ubisoft claimed CM10 is stronger than CM9, or is it just an assumption >>>that each version will be stronger? Of course I understand you are not inferring >>>that Shredder is clearly stronger based on two games. >>> regards >>> Lin >>> PS Thanks for the boring work putting these two games together manually. >> >>I believe that John originally said it was at least 100 Elo stronger than >>CM9000. I don't believe it. No, I'm not making a judgement based on 2 games >>but it certainly is off to a bad start. Shredder seems to have been in control >>of both games right from the start. >>Jim > >I didn't say that. I have no knowledge of the engine in CMX000. > >I said that the engine in CM9000 was 50-100 points stronger than the engine in >CM8000. > >jm Sorry, John. I did not understand you correctly. We were talking about the new Chessmaster coming out and you regressed to the 9K vs 8K programs and I missed it. It was reported here that the download version is using 16M for hash. Is that true or do you know? Thanks, Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.